Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow: a synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations
ZHAN Kejie1,2, LIU Shizeng2, YANG Zihui2, FANG Etian2, ZHOU Lanping2, HUANG Ning1*
1 Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disaster and Environment in China (Ministry of Education), Department of Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2 Minqin National Station for Desert Steppe Ecosystem Studies, Minqin 733000, China
Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow: a synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations
ZHAN Kejie1,2, LIU Shizeng2, YANG Zihui2, FANG Etian2, ZHOU Lanping2, HUANG Ning1*
1 Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disaster and Environment in China (Ministry of Education), Department of Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2 Minqin National Station for Desert Steppe Ecosystem Studies, Minqin 733000, China
摘要 Sand-fixing and windbreak forests are widely used to protect or/and improve the ecological environments in arid and semi-arid regions. A full understanding of wind flow characteristics is essential to arranging the patterns of these protective forests for enhancing the effectiveness. In this study, the wind velocity over the underlying surface with sand-fixing forests and windbreak forests at the heights of 1–49 m was monitored from two 50-m high observation towers in an oasis of Minqin, Gansu Province of China. The wind velocities were simulated at different locations over these protective forests between those two towers by a two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model. The results showed that at the heights of 1–49 m, the wind velocity profiles followed a classical logarithm law at the edge of the oasis and a multilayer structure inside the oasis. With increasing number of sand-fixing forest and windbreak forest arrays, the wind velocity at the heights of 1–49 m generally decreased along the downstream direction of the prevailing wind. Specifically, below the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity decelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then accelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. In contrast, above the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity accelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then generally decelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. Both the array number and array spacing of sand-fixing and windbreak forests could influence the wind velocity. The wind protection effects of sand-fixing forests were closely related to the array spacing of windbreak forests and increased with the addition of sand-fixing forests when the array of the forests was adequately spaced. However, if the array spacing of windbreak forests was smaller than seven times of the heights of windbreak forests, the effects were reduced or completely masked by the effects of windbreak forests. The results could offer theoretical guidelines on how to systematically arrange the patterns of sand-fixing and windbreak forests for preventing wind erosion in the most convenient and the cheapest ways.
Abstract：
Sand-fixing and windbreak forests are widely used to protect or/and improve the ecological environments in arid and semi-arid regions. A full understanding of wind flow characteristics is essential to arranging the patterns of these protective forests for enhancing the effectiveness. In this study, the wind velocity over the underlying surface with sand-fixing forests and windbreak forests at the heights of 1–49 m was monitored from two 50-m high observation towers in an oasis of Minqin, Gansu Province of China. The wind velocities were simulated at different locations over these protective forests between those two towers by a two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model. The results showed that at the heights of 1–49 m, the wind velocity profiles followed a classical logarithm law at the edge of the oasis and a multilayer structure inside the oasis. With increasing number of sand-fixing forest and windbreak forest arrays, the wind velocity at the heights of 1–49 m generally decreased along the downstream direction of the prevailing wind. Specifically, below the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity decelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then accelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. In contrast, above the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity accelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then generally decelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. Both the array number and array spacing of sand-fixing and windbreak forests could influence the wind velocity. The wind protection effects of sand-fixing forests were closely related to the array spacing of windbreak forests and increased with the addition of sand-fixing forests when the array of the forests was adequately spaced. However, if the array spacing of windbreak forests was smaller than seven times of the heights of windbreak forests, the effects were reduced or completely masked by the effects of windbreak forests. The results could offer theoretical guidelines on how to systematically arrange the patterns of sand-fixing and windbreak forests for preventing wind erosion in the most convenient and the cheapest ways.
the Forestry Industry Research Special Funds for Public Welfare Projects (201404306), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371034, 41361001, 31560235), the National Key Technologies R & D Program of China (2013BAC07B01) and the Gansu Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (145RJDA327).
通讯作者: HUANG Ning
E-mail: huangn@lzu.edu.cn
引用本文:
ZHAN Kejie,LIU Shizeng,YANG Zihui等. Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow: a synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(1): 1-12.
ZHAN Kejie,LIU Shizeng,YANG Zihui et al. Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow: a synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2017, 9(1): 1-12.
2017, Vol. 9 
|
