Comparison of post-earthquake emergency assessment researches on building damage and safety in China and overseas
Sun Baitao1,2 Zhang Lei1,2,3
1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
3. Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
Abstract：As one important emergency work, post-earthquake damage and safety assessment of buildings has attracted special attention all over the world. To attain unified, scientific and rapid identification results on site, safety assessment research is changing from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis in recent years. In this study, the National Standards, implementation and quantitative research of field work for safety assessment of buildings in the United States, Japan, Greece and China, etc., are introduced and compared. The ATC-20 series standards of United States, instructions on post-earthquake damage evaluation of buildings in Japan, the safety assessment procedures in Greece, and the safety assessment standard of China as well as its various revisions are particularly introduced. Furthermore, the quantitative algorithms and the corresponding systems of safety assessment in Japan, Colombia and China are elaborated in details. By comparing those safety assessment standards as well as the similarities and differences of quantitative algorithms and systems of safety assessment in China and some other countries, some successful foreign experiences which can be referred to are summarized, as a further reference for revision of standards and improvements of algorithm and system in China.
孙柏涛 张磊. 国内外地震现场建筑物安全鉴定研究的比较[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(7): 8-19.
Sun Baitao Zhang Lei. Comparison of post-earthquake emergency assessment researches on building damage and safety in China and overseas. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(7): 8-19.
