土木工程学报  2022, Vol. 55 Issue (5): 73-85    
  桥梁工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥设计与试验
王皓磊1,2 李昊1 唐源1 李文倩1 王小炜3 陈爱军1
1. 中南林业科技大学,湖南长沙 410004; 2. 风工程与桥梁工程湖南省重点实验室,湖南长沙 410082;
3. 佳筑建筑科技有限公司, 上海 200092
Design and experiment of FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge
Wang Haolei 1,2 Li Hao 1Tang Yuan 1Li Wenqian 1Wang Xiaowei 3Chen Aijun 1
1. Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Changsha 410082, China;
3. Jiazhu Architecture Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
全文: PDF (1940 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为适应我国桥梁建设环境友好转型发展的需要,并针对传统木-混凝土组合梁自重大、长期变形大及耐久性不足,难以应用到中等跨径桥梁的问题,提出一种可整体预制、整跨吊装的FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥。对20m、30m跨径的FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥试设计,并与同等跨径的传统木混凝土组合梁桥和预应力混凝土梁桥进行材料用量和经济性的对比;对30m跨径的试设计桥梁进行荷载组合效应计算,根据计算结果以中国桥梁设计规范为基础,同时参考欧洲规范5,基于弹性设计法对FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥的承载能力极限状态和正常使用极限状态进行设计计算;对30m跨径的试设计桥梁按照纵向1∶5的比例缩尺,设计制作了2根试验梁模型,并进行试验研究。研究结果表明:20m跨径的试设计桥梁的自重分别减至传统木-混凝土组合梁和预应力混凝土梁的72.7%和48.0%,全寿命造价分别为二者的79.1%及106.4%;30m跨径的试设计桥梁的自重减至预应力混凝土梁的49.3%,全寿命造价为它的134.0%;试设计FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥具有足够的抗弯与抗剪承载力,活载作用下的结构挠度小于限值,满足工程受力要求;按照欧洲规范5进行设计,结构具有较大安全储备,理论计算偏安全;FRP的植入使组合梁的极限承载能力提高了约8.6%,并能改善其破坏形态、提高延性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王皓磊 李昊 唐源 李文倩 王小炜 陈爱军
关键词 桥梁工程 现代木结构 试设计 初步试验 抗弯性能 抗剪性能    
Abstract:The FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge which can be fully precast and integrally hoisted was proposed, in order to meet the demands from environment-friendly transition and development of bridge construction in China, and in order to address the ever-existing problems for conventional timber-concrete composite girder, including heavy dead weight, large long-term deflection and inadequate durability, which make it hard to be applied to medium-span bridges. The material consumption and economical efficiency of trial design of 20 m and 30 m span FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge were compared with those of conventional timber-concrete composite girder bridge and prestressed concrete girder bridge with the same span; the design value of load combination for the 30 m-span trial bridge were obtained by calculation, and based on the calculated value, the domestic bridge codes and Eurocode 5 were adopted for structural analyses in ultimate limit state and serviceability limit state using the elastic design method. Two test models were designed and manufactured according to the scaled 30m-span trial bridge at the longitudinal ratio of 1∶5, and the detailed experimental study was conducted. The findings show that the dead weight of 20m-span trial bridge girder can be reduced to 72.7% and 48.0% of the conventional timber-concrete composite girder and prestressed concrete girder, respectively, while its life cycle cost is 79.1% and 106.4% of the above two bridge types. The dead weight of 30m-span trial bridge girder can be reduced to 49.3% of the prestressed concrete girder, while its life cycle cost is 134.0% of the prestressed concrete girder. The flexural and shear behaviors of the trial FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge meet the requirement of engineering application, while the structural deflection under living load is less than limit value, indicating that the bridge has enough rigidity. The FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge designed based on Eurocode 5 has large safety reserve, revealing that the design method is relatively conservative. With the application of FRP, the bearing capacity of the composite girder can be increased by 8.6%, and the failure pattern can be improved with good ductility.
Key wordsbridge engineering    modern timber structure    trial design    preliminary test    flexural behavior    shear behavior
    
引用本文:   
王皓磊 李昊 唐源 李文倩 王小炜 陈爱军. FRP-胶合木-UHPC组合梁桥设计与试验[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(5): 73-85.
Wang Haolei Li Hao Tang Yuan Li Wenqian Wang Xiaowei Chen Aijun . Design and experiment of FRP-Glulam-UHPC composite girder bridge. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(5): 73-85.
链接本文:  
http://manu36.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_tmgcxb/CN/     或     http://manu36.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_tmgcxb/CN/Y2022/V55/I5/73
主办:中国土木工程学会 地址:北京三里河路9号建设部内

《土木工程学报》杂志社有限公司 版权所有 · 京ICP备05023187号
地址:北京三里河路9号建设部内 邮政编码:100835 电话/传真:010-57811488  E-mail:tumuxuebao@ccej.net